From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hildreth v. Mercantile Trust Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1906
112 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)

Opinion

April, 1906.


We are of opinion that the demurrer is not so plainly bad as to require no argument to show it so, and that bare inspection of the pleading indicates that it was made in bad faith. Therefore, it cannot be disposed of as frivolous. ( Cook v. Warren, 88 N.Y. 37; Strong v. Sproul, 53 id. 497; Shaw v. Feltman, 99 App. Div. 514.) The learned counsel for the respondent contends that we should go beyond the question of frivolousness to the merits, but under our decision in Shaw v. Feltman ( supra) we think that we should not do so. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with costs. Woodward, Gaynor and Rich, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with costs.


Summaries of

Hildreth v. Mercantile Trust Company

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1906
112 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)
Case details for

Hildreth v. Mercantile Trust Company

Case Details

Full title:Joseph D. Hildreth, Respondent, v. Mercantile Trust Company and Others…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1906

Citations

112 App. Div. 916 (N.Y. App. Div. 1906)