From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hildebrand v. Campbell

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 7, 2024
24-cv-01791 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-01791 BLF (PR)

05-07-2024

MICHAEL HILDEBRAND, Petitioner, v. TRISHA CAMPBELL, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

BETH LABSON FREEMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On March 21, 2024, Petitioner, a California state prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. No. 1. On the same day, the Clerk sent a notice to Petitioner informing him that he must file a complete In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) application within twenty-eight days from the date of the notice to avoid dismissal. Dkt. No. 2.

The deadline to file an IFP application has passed, and Petitioner has failed to respond. Furthermore, there has been no other communication from Petitioner. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to pay the filing fee.

The Clerk shall terminate all pending deadlines and close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hildebrand v. Campbell

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 7, 2024
24-cv-01791 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Hildebrand v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HILDEBRAND, Petitioner, v. TRISHA CAMPBELL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 7, 2024

Citations

24-cv-01791 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 7, 2024)