From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hildebrand v. Campbell

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 15, 2024
24-cv-01791 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 15, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-01791 BLF (PR)

05-15-2024

MICHAEL HILDEBRAND, Petitioner, v. TRISHA CAMPBELL, Respondent.


ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT AND REOPENING ACTION

BETH LABSON FREEMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On March 21, 2024, Petitioner, a California state prisoner, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this Court. Dkt. No. 1. On May 7, 2024, the Court dismissed this case for Petitioner's failure to file a complete in forma pauperis application or pay the $5.00 filing fee in the time provided. Dkt. Nos. 3, 4.

It has recently come to the Court's attention that Petitioner paid the fee on April 15, 2024, but the receipt was not docketed until May 14, 2024. Dkt. No. 5. Therefore, this case was improperly closed due to a clerical error. In the interest of justice, the Court will reopen this action.

The judgment entered on May 7, 2024, is hereby VACATED. Dkt. No. 4. The Clerk shall reopen this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hildebrand v. Campbell

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 15, 2024
24-cv-01791 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 15, 2024)
Case details for

Hildebrand v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HILDEBRAND, Petitioner, v. TRISHA CAMPBELL, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 15, 2024

Citations

24-cv-01791 BLF (PR) (N.D. Cal. May. 15, 2024)