From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hightower v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Feb 7, 2012
NO. 3-11-0235 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 7, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 3-11-0235

02-07-2012

JEFFREY ELIJAH HIGHTOWER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


JUDGE CAMPBELL


ORDER

Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 47) and various filings by the Plaintiff (Docket Nos. 49-51 and 53-55).

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Plaintiff's documents, and the file. The objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 49) is denied, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved.

Accordingly, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 30) is GRANTED, and this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to close the file, and any other pending Motions are denied as moot. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

TODD J. CAMPBELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hightower v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Feb 7, 2012
NO. 3-11-0235 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Hightower v. United States

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY ELIJAH HIGHTOWER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Feb 7, 2012

Citations

NO. 3-11-0235 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 7, 2012)