From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

High, Clarke Feneis v. Pub. Serv

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 24, 1970
238 So. 2d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

No. 69-1046.

July 28, 1970. Rehearing Denied August 24, 1970.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, James W. Kehoe, J.

George McQuade, Miami, for appellant.

Bolles, Goodwin, Ryskamp Ware, and Robert Lane, Jr., Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, C.J., and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.


The defendant counterclaimant appeals from a final judgment for the plaintiff after a jury found for the appellee upon its claim and against the appellant upon its counterclaim.

The sole point presented on appeal asserts that the instruction given by the trial court incorrectly stated the law applicable to the case. The record reveals that the judgment must be affirmed without our passing upon the sufficiency of the instruction, because appellant did not raise at the time of the charge conference the objection it urges here. Its sole objection below was so general in nature as to fail to inform the court of the objection raised here. Henningsen v. Smith, Fla.App. 1965, 174 So.2d 85, 87.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

High, Clarke Feneis v. Pub. Serv

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 24, 1970
238 So. 2d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

High, Clarke Feneis v. Pub. Serv

Case Details

Full title:HIGH, CLARKE FENEIS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 24, 1970

Citations

238 So. 2d 169 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1970)

Citing Cases

Abrams v. Paul

We do not reach the merits of this argument because no such error is preserved absent an objection to the…