From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Higgins v. Larose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 29, 2014
Case No. 5:13 CV 2528 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 29, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 5:13 CV 2528

12-29-2014

Thomas Higgins, Petitioner, v. Christopher Larose, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Magistrate Judge filed December 10, 2014 (Doc. 10). The R&R recommends this Court deny the Petition on the merits.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a party must serve written objections to the Magistrate Judge's proposed findings and recommendations within fourteen (14) days of being served with the R&R, at which time this Court makes a de novo determination of those portions of the R&R to which objections were made. The failure to file objections within the time frame set forth in the statute constitutes a waiver of de novo review by the district court. See United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir. 2005); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).

Petitioner's deadline for filing objections has passed, and no requests for extension have been received. The R&R accurately states the facts and law, which this Court adopts in its entirety. Accordingly, this Court denies the Petition and dismisses this case with prejudice. This Court further declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jack Zouhary

JACK ZOUHARY

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

December 29, 2014


Summaries of

Higgins v. Larose

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Dec 29, 2014
Case No. 5:13 CV 2528 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 29, 2014)
Case details for

Higgins v. Larose

Case Details

Full title:Thomas Higgins, Petitioner, v. Christopher Larose, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 29, 2014

Citations

Case No. 5:13 CV 2528 (N.D. Ohio Dec. 29, 2014)