Opinion
No. 99-1647.
November 10, 1999.
Appeal from Washington App. No. 98CA7.
DISMISSALS, SUA SPONTE, NO SUBSTANTIAL CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION AND DISCRETIONARY APPEALS, IF APPLICABLE, NOT ALLOWED
Resnick, J., dissents.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Hiener v. Kelley
Supreme Court of Ohio, Columbus
Nov 10, 1999
719 N.E.2d 5 (Ohio 1999)
Summaries of
Hiener v. Kelley
Supreme Court of Ohio, Columbus
Nov 10, 1999
719 N.E.2d 5 (Ohio 1999)
Case details for
Hiener v. Kelley
Case Details
Full title:Hiener v. Kelley
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio, Columbus
Date published: Nov 10, 1999
Citations
719 N.E.2d 5 (Ohio 1999)
87 Ohio St. 3d 1441
Citing Cases
Fruth Farms v. Village of Holgate
Use of an unrestricted easement for access must be reasonable; an easement is terminated by overuse. Hiener…
Walbridge v. Carroll{¶ 32} The court of appeals held that "`[w]hether an easement is extinguished through overburdening or misuse…