From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hidden v. Raynolds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

November, 1931.


Judgment, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Young, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents upon the ground that Raynolds accomplished all he could legally do when he assumed to prevent a contest by all who lawfully could be advised or controlled by him; Scudder, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Hidden v. Raynolds

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Hidden v. Raynolds

Case Details

Full title:FRANCES E. HIDDEN and Others, Respondents, v. EDWARD H. RAYNOLDS and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1931

Citations

234 App. Div. 796 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Citing Cases

Matter of Cronin

Surrogate FOWLER in Matter of Hock ( 74 Misc. 15, 28) said: "A contested probate is a trial, nevertheless, of…