From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Zimmerman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 16, 2021
21-CV-6371 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-6371 (LTS)

09-16-2021

ROBERT HICKS, Plaintiff, v. AARON ZIMMERMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

By order dated August 6, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff, within thirty days, to submit a completed amended request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) or pay the $402.00 in fees required to file a civil action in this Court. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended IFP application or paid the fees. Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal .Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Zimmerman

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 16, 2021
21-CV-6371 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Hicks v. Zimmerman

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT HICKS, Plaintiff, v. AARON ZIMMERMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 16, 2021

Citations

21-CV-6371 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2021)