From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 11, 2008
979 So. 2d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 5D07-4076.

April 11, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Maura T. Smith, J.

Corey D. Hicks, Bowling Green, pro se.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


The appellant, Corey D. Hicks, seeks review of the denial by the trial court of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Mr. Hicks essentially sought to assert a claim of ineffective collateral counsel growing out of his failed efforts to obtain post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.

We affirm the order denying the petition in all respects. As the trial court noted, a claim of ineffective assistance of collateral counsel does not provide a valid basis for relief. See Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 107 S.Ct. 1990, 95 L.Ed.2d 539 (1987).

It appears that counsel retained by Mr. Hicks did file a timely, though unsuccessful, motion for post-conviction relief. If that is not the case, as Mr. Hicks may be implying, and if he otherwise qualifies, Mr. Hicks may have another avenue of relief under rule 3.850(b)(3).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, MONACO, and TORPY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hicks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 11, 2008
979 So. 2d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Hicks v. State

Case Details

Full title:Corey D. HICKS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 11, 2008

Citations

979 So. 2d 360 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Borroto v. State

However, "a claim of ineffective assistance of collateral counsel does not provide a valid basis for [habeas]…