From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Skolem Grp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 15, 2022
5:22-cv-00793-SPG-SHK (C.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2022)

Opinion

5:22-cv-00793-SPG-SHK

09-15-2022

Teresa Hicks v. Skolem Group LLC et al


CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiffs) to show cause, in writing, on or before September 29, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Plaintiff(s) obtained entry of default as to Defendant Skolem Group LLC, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a), but Plaintiff(s) have not sought default judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking default judgment or by notifying the Court that default judgment will not be sought, at which point the clerk will close this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Skolem Grp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 15, 2022
5:22-cv-00793-SPG-SHK (C.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Hicks v. Skolem Grp.

Case Details

Full title:Teresa Hicks v. Skolem Group LLC et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 15, 2022

Citations

5:22-cv-00793-SPG-SHK (C.D. Cal. Sep. 15, 2022)