Opinion
21-CV-6369 (LTS)
07-27-2021
ROBERT HICKS, Plaintiff, v. PAMELA SANCHEZ; JENNELL HOWARD, REGIONAL PROPERTY MGR., Defendants.
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEES OR AMENDED IFP APPLICATION
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, United States District Judge:
Plaintiff Robert Hicks brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff must either pay $402.00 in fees - a $350.00 filing fee plus a $52.00 administrative fee - or, to request authorization to proceed without prepayment of fees, that is, in forma pauperis (“IFP”), submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.
Plaintiff submitted an IFP application, but he does not fully answer the questions pertaining to his financial situation. Plaintiff fails to answer question 2 which asks Plaintiff about his employment status. If Plaintiff is presently employed, the application asks Plaintiff to provide information about his current employer and his gross monthly wages, but if Plaintiff is not presently employed, question 2 asks Plaintiff to provide the date of his last employment, and his gross monthly wages at the time. In question 3, Plaintiff checks the boxes indicating that he does not receive income from any of the listed sources, but he does not provide an answer in response to the question asking him to explain how he pays his expenses. In question 6, Plaintiff also fails to detail his housing, transportation, utilities, or other monthly expenses. Because Plaintiff fails to supply sufficient information explaining any sources of income and how he pays his expenses, it is unclear whether Plaintiff has sufficient funds to pay the filing fees for this action. The Court is therefore unable to make a ruling on Plaintiff's IFP application.
Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $402.00 in fees or submit an amended IFP application. Plaintiff must answer the questions as they pertain to his current financial situation. If Plaintiff submits the amended IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 21-CV-6369 (LTS), and address the deficiencies indicated above by providing facts to establish that he is unable to pay the filing fees. If the Court grants the amended IFP application, Plaintiff will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).
The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.
The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).
SO ORDERED.