From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Rowe

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 28, 2011
CV 11-0680 CJC (FMO) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2011)

Opinion


MICHAEL J. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. L. ROWE, et al., Defendants. No. CV 11-0680 CJC (FMO) United States District Court, C.D. California. April 28, 2011

          ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Objections to the Report and Recommendation. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

         1. Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.

         2. The Clerk shall serve copies of this Order and the Judgment on the parties.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Rowe

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 28, 2011
CV 11-0680 CJC (FMO) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2011)
Case details for

Hicks v. Rowe

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL J. HICKS, Plaintiff, v. L. ROWE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 28, 2011

Citations

CV 11-0680 CJC (FMO) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 28, 2011)

Citing Cases

Hicks v. Yeh

Plaintiff has filed more than forty cases throughout California. The Court has found the following five…