From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Pac. Oil Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 19, 2022
ED CV 22-144 PA (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. May. 19, 2022)

Opinion

ED CV 22-144 PA (GJSx)

05-19-2022

Teresa Hicks v. Pacific Oil Company LLC, et al.


Present: The PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Honorable

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: Order to Show Cause Re: Dismissal For Lack Of Prosecution

Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that this time period has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before May 26, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Pac. Oil Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 19, 2022
ED CV 22-144 PA (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. May. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Hicks v. Pac. Oil Co.

Case Details

Full title:Teresa Hicks v. Pacific Oil Company LLC, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 19, 2022

Citations

ED CV 22-144 PA (GJSx) (C.D. Cal. May. 19, 2022)