From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Kelley

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division
Aug 9, 2011
NO: 2:11CV00085 JMM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Aug. 9, 2011)

Opinion

NO: 2:11CV00085 JMM/HDY.

August 9, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff filed this complaint on April 28, 2011, and service was ordered. On August 5, 2011, the summons was returned unexecuted as to Defendants Holloway, Stell, and Gorden (docket entries #22-#24). Service had been attempted in the care of the Arkansas Department of Correction ("ADC"), but was returned because Holloway, Stell, and Gorden, are not ADC employees. However, they may be employed by the prison's medical contractor. Accordingly, service will be attempted in the care of counsel for the contractor.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT service is appropriate on Defendants Holloway, Stell, and Gorden, and the United States Marshal is directed to serve a copy of the complaint and amended complaint (docket entries #2 #18), this order, and summons, upon them, in the care of counsel for the prison's medical contractor, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Kelley

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division
Aug 9, 2011
NO: 2:11CV00085 JMM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Aug. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Hicks v. Kelley

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY HICKS ADC #97307 PLAINTIFF v. WENDY KELLEY et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Helena Division

Date published: Aug 9, 2011

Citations

NO: 2:11CV00085 JMM/HDY (E.D. Ark. Aug. 9, 2011)