Opinion
21 Civ. 9093 (PAE) 21 Civ. 9224 (PAE)
12-17-2021
JOYCE HICKS and STEPHEN GOLDBERGER, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,, Plaintiffs, v. HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Defendant. DAWN BEGIN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,, Plaintiff, v. HEARST COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Defendant.
ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, DISTRICT JUDGE
On December 8, 2021, the Court received plaintiffs' motions to consolidate the two above-captioned cases and to appoint interim class counsel. On December 9, 2021, the Court directed defendant to file a short letter by December 14, 2021, stating its position on consolidating these two cases. On December 14, 2021, plaintiffs filed a letter withdrawing their motions. That same day, defendant filed a letter stating that it welcomed consolidating the two cases.
Notwithstanding plaintiffs' withdrawal of their motion, the Court hereby consolidates the two above-captioned cases, given the overwhelming legal and factual overlap between them- each bringing the same claim on behalf of the same putative class of Ohio residents. Compare 21 Civ. 9093 (PAE), Dkt. 1; with 21 Civ. 9224 (PAE), Dkt. 1. All filings in the above-captioned cases shall be entered in the docket of the new lead case, 21 Civ. 9093 (PAE).
The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion pending at 21 Civ. 9093 (PAE), Dkt. 13; to amend the case caption of the consolidated to be "Joyce Hicks et al. v. Hearst Communications, Inc."; and to close the case at docket 21 Civ. 9224 (PAE).
SO ORDERED.