Hicks v. Fla. Dep't of Corr.

Full title: VICTOR HICKS, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK S…

Court: FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: May 21, 2019

No. 1D19-1333 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. May. 21, 2019)

Opinion

No. 1D19-1333

05-21-2019

VICTOR HICKS, Petitioner, v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK S. INCH, Respondent.

Victor Hicks, pro se, Petitioner. Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied on the merits. See Clark v. Nichols M. N. P., 225 So. 3d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (holding that to be entitled to mandamus relief compelling a ruling on a pending matter, a petitioner must demonstrate that he has noticed the matter for hearing in the lower tribunal). ROBERTS, RAY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla . R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. Victor Hicks, pro se, Petitioner. Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.