From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Dollar Gen. Mkt.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 1, 2017
2:15-cv-00405-JAD-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 1, 2017)

Opinion

2:15-cv-00405-JAD-PAL

03-01-2017

Natasha Hicks, Plaintiff v. Dollar General Market, et al., Defendants


Order Adopting Report and Recommendation

[ECF No. 15]

On February 8, 2017, Magistrate Judge Peggy Leen entered a report recommending that plaintiff Natasha Hicks's discrimination claim be dismissed without prejudice and that the claims against defendants Richard Lindsey, Tiffany Doe, Bianca Doe, and Cindy Doe be dismissed. "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed." Objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation were due by February 22, 2017, and no objections have been filed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [ECF No. 15] is ADOPTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Hicks's discrimination claim is dismissed without prejudice and that all claims against Richard A. Lindsey, Tiffany Doe, Bianca Doe, and Cindy Doe are DISMISSED.

Dated this 1st day of March, 2017.

/s/_________

Jennifer A. Dorsey

United States District Judge

Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).


Summaries of

Hicks v. Dollar Gen. Mkt.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Mar 1, 2017
2:15-cv-00405-JAD-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 1, 2017)
Case details for

Hicks v. Dollar Gen. Mkt.

Case Details

Full title:Natasha Hicks, Plaintiff v. Dollar General Market, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 1, 2017

Citations

2:15-cv-00405-JAD-PAL (D. Nev. Mar. 1, 2017)