From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Clayton

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 7, 2021
Civil Action 21-cv-01866-JLS-WVG (S.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2021)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-cv-01866-JLS-WVG

12-07-2021

Michael Hicks Plaintiff, v. D. Clayton, M.D.; P. Shakiba, M.D.; Dr. S. Roberts, CME; M. Glynn, CEO; S. Gates Chief, Health Care Appeals Defendant.


JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed IFP (ECF No. 2) as barred by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), DISMISSES this civil action based on Plaintiff's failure to pay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), CERTIFIES that an IFP appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Case is closed.


Summaries of

Hicks v. Clayton

United States District Court, Southern District of California
Dec 7, 2021
Civil Action 21-cv-01866-JLS-WVG (S.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Hicks v. Clayton

Case Details

Full title:Michael Hicks Plaintiff, v. D. Clayton, M.D.; P. Shakiba, M.D.; Dr. S…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of California

Date published: Dec 7, 2021

Citations

Civil Action 21-cv-01866-JLS-WVG (S.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2021)