From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. California State Prison Dvi

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 6, 2015
2:15-cv-0871 KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2015)

Opinion


STEVEN HICKS, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON DVI, Defendant. No. 2:15-cv-0871 KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. May 6, 2015

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee of $350.00 plus the $50.00 administrative fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Therefore, plaintiff will be provided the opportunity either to submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the required fees totaling $400.00.

If leave to file in forma pauperis is granted, plaintiff will still be required to pay the filing fee but will be allowed to pay it in installments. Litigants proceeding in forma pauperis are not required to pay the $50.00 administrative fee.

         In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the required fees in the amount of $400.00; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.


Summaries of

Hicks v. California State Prison Dvi

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
May 6, 2015
2:15-cv-0871 KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Hicks v. California State Prison Dvi

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN HICKS, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON DVI, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: May 6, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-0871 KJN P (E.D. Cal. May. 6, 2015)