From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Bracero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 8, 2014
12 Civ. 9000 (AT) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2014)

Opinion

12 Civ. 9000 (AT) (HBP)

08-08-2014

ROBERT HICKS, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH BRACERO, Shield #173 Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

:

On December 10, 2012, Plaintiff, Robert Hicks, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 16, 2013, the Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman for general pretrial proceedings. On December 9, 2013, Defendant, Joseph Bracero, filed a motion to change venue to White Plains. Plaintiff did not file opposition papers. After careful consideration, Magistrate Judge Pitman issued a Report and Recommendation ("R & R"), proposing that Defendant's motion to change venue to White Plains be granted. Despite notification of the right to object to the R & R, no objections were filed, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). When no objection is made, the Court reviews the R & R for clear error. Santiago v. Colvin, 12 Civ. 7052, 2014 WL 1092967, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014). The Court finds no clear error. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Pitman's R & R in its entirety.

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 18 and to transfer the case to White Plains.

SO ORDERED. Dated: August 8, 2014

New York, New York

/s/_________

ANALISA TORRES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hicks v. Bracero

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Aug 8, 2014
12 Civ. 9000 (AT) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2014)
Case details for

Hicks v. Bracero

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT HICKS, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH BRACERO, Shield #173 Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Aug 8, 2014

Citations

12 Civ. 9000 (AT) (HBP) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 2014)

Citing Cases

ProImmune Co. v. Lile

The Court finds that the interests of justice and judicial economy would be served by reassignment of this…