From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hicks v. Arkansas Department of Correction

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Northern Division
Aug 9, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00047 BSM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Aug. 9, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00047 BSM/JTR.

August 9, 2011


ORDER


The proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 6] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray have been received. No objections have been filed. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record, it is concluded that the proposed findings and recommended disposition [Doc. No. 6] should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety in all respects.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1. The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, for failure to state a claim.

2. Dismissal constitutes a "strike" as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

3. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Hicks v. Arkansas Department of Correction

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Northern Division
Aug 9, 2011
CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00047 BSM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Aug. 9, 2011)
Case details for

Hicks v. Arkansas Department of Correction

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN JAMES HICKS, ADC #138964 PLAINTIFF v. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Northern Division

Date published: Aug 9, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:11-cv-00047 BSM/JTR (E.D. Ark. Aug. 9, 2011)