From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hickok Music Company, Inc. v. Wurtzel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1924
208 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)

Opinion

April, 1924.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion the liability of Rosen is not shown so plainly as to require the granting of defendants' motion. Jaycox, Manning, Kelby, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hickok Music Company, Inc. v. Wurtzel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1924
208 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)
Case details for

Hickok Music Company, Inc. v. Wurtzel

Case Details

Full title:THE HICKOK MUSIC COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. ISADORE WURTZEL and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1924

Citations

208 App. Div. 849 (N.Y. App. Div. 1924)