From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hickman v. Morris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION
Mar 26, 2021
No. 4:20CV91-DAS (N.D. Miss. Mar. 26, 2021)

Opinion

No. 4:20CV91-DAS

03-26-2021

BENNIE EARL HICKMAN PLAINTIFF v. WARDEN MORRIS DEPUTY WARDEN LEE SIMON LIEUTENANT HAMP C/O BUTLER C/O PARKER C/O TOWNSEND SUPERINTENDENT MARSHAL TURNER DEFENDANTS


JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this day:

(1) Defendants Morris and Simon are DISMISSED with prejudice from this case for failure to state a claim against them upon which relief could be granted;

(2) The plaintiff's claims against defendant Marshal Turner regarding general conditions of confinement will PROCEED;

(3) The plaintiff's claim against defendant Townsend for use of excessive force will also PROCEED; and

(4) The plaintiff's claims against defendants Butler, Parker, and Townsend for failure to protect will PROCEED.

SO ORDERED, this, the 26th day of March, 2021.

/s/ David A. Sanders

DAVID A. SANDERS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hickman v. Morris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION
Mar 26, 2021
No. 4:20CV91-DAS (N.D. Miss. Mar. 26, 2021)
Case details for

Hickman v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:BENNIE EARL HICKMAN PLAINTIFF v. WARDEN MORRIS DEPUTY WARDEN LEE SIMON…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI GREENVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 26, 2021

Citations

No. 4:20CV91-DAS (N.D. Miss. Mar. 26, 2021)