From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hickles v. Johnson

United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin
Jul 12, 2024
24-cv-442-wmc (W.D. Wis. Jul. 12, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-442-wmc

07-12-2024

MARK HICKLES, Plaintiff, v. KIRSTEN JOHNSON, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

ANDREW R. WISEMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Mark Hickles has filed a proposed civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that his rights have been violated at the Sand Ridge Secure Treatment Center, where plaintiff is in custody under Wis.Stat. Ch. 980. Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee. As proof of indigence, plaintiff has submitted a certified copy of a resident account statement.

After considering the motion and the supporting documentation, I conclude that plaintiff qualifies for indigent status. Using information from the account statement for the six-month period preceding the filing of this case, I have determined that plaintiff owes an initial partial payment of $97.90. For this case to proceed, plaintiff must pay this amount by August 9, 2024.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The motion by plaintiff Mark Hickles for leave to proceed without prepaying the filing fee is GRANTED. Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial payment of $97.90. Plaintiff must submit a check or money order payable to the clerk of court for $97.90 by August 9, 2024. If plaintiff fails to make the payment or fails to show cause why the payment could not be made, then I will assume that plaintiff wishes to withdraw this case voluntarily. In that event, the case will be dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i). If plaintiff submits the initial partial payment within 30 days of dismissal, the case will be reopened. The court will not reopen the case after 30 days unless plaintiff makes a showing that they are entitled to relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b).

2. No further action will be taken in this case until the clerk's office receives the initial partial payment as directed above and the court has screened the complaint as required under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Once the screening process is complete, the court will issue a separate order.


Summaries of

Hickles v. Johnson

United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin
Jul 12, 2024
24-cv-442-wmc (W.D. Wis. Jul. 12, 2024)
Case details for

Hickles v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:MARK HICKLES, Plaintiff, v. KIRSTEN JOHNSON, et al. Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin

Date published: Jul 12, 2024

Citations

24-cv-442-wmc (W.D. Wis. Jul. 12, 2024)