From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hickinbotham v. Monroe

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1865
28 Cal. 489 (Cal. 1865)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court, Fifth Judicial District, San Joaquin County.

         COUNSEL:

         Tyler & Cobb, for Appellant.

          John C. Byers, for Respondents.


         JUDGES: Sawyer, J.

         OPINION

          SAWYER, Judge

         The time for filing briefs having expired three months ago, and none having been filed, and there being no points on file, as required by rule seventeen, the judgment is affirmed, on the authority of Edmondson v. Alameda Co. (24 Cal. 349), and Hutton v. Reed (25 Cal. 488). A like disposition will be made of all cases similarly situated, when taken up for decision in their proper order.


Summaries of

Hickinbotham v. Monroe

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1865
28 Cal. 489 (Cal. 1865)
Case details for

Hickinbotham v. Monroe

Case Details

Full title:J. T. HICKINBOTHAM v. P. MONROE et al.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1865

Citations

28 Cal. 489 (Cal. 1865)

Citing Cases

Peek v. Peek

The rule is, that where the appellant neither makes an oral argument, nor files any brief, the court will…

McFadden v. Dietz

If appellant's points and authorities be not filed with the clerk of the supreme court together with proof of…