From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hibernia Sav. & Loan Society v. Behnke

Supreme Court of California
Oct 8, 1897
118 Cal. 498 (Cal. 1897)

Opinion

         Department One

         MOTION to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to set aside a sale. William T. Wallace, Judge.

         COUNSEL:

         T. Z. Blakeman, for Appellant.

         A. Tobin, and Thomas F. Barry, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         THE COURT

         The appeal herein is taken from an order refusing to set aside a sale by the sheriff under a decree of foreclosure. The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal for failure to serve the notice upon one claimed by it to be an adverse party. The motion was not made until after the appellant had filed his points and authorities upon the appeal, and the respondent has included the points in support of the motion with its points and authorities upon the appeal. The determination of the motion involves an examination of the entire record, and incidentally of the merits of the appeal, and ought not to be determined in advance of the hearing of the cause. The motion is, therefore, continued until the hearing upon the appeal.


Summaries of

Hibernia Sav. & Loan Society v. Behnke

Supreme Court of California
Oct 8, 1897
118 Cal. 498 (Cal. 1897)
Case details for

Hibernia Sav. & Loan Society v. Behnke

Case Details

Full title:HIBERNIA SAVINGS AND LOAN SOCIETY, Respondent, v. ROSA BEHNKE, Executrix…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 8, 1897

Citations

118 Cal. 498 (Cal. 1897)
50 P. 666

Citing Cases

Quist v. Michael

In accordance with the practice of this court in such cases, that examination will not be made in advance of…

Nicoletti v. Bank of Los Banos

We are not lacking an authority upon that question in California, although the decisions are not agreed upon…