From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H.G. v. Orcutt Union Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 27, 2022
CV 21-4267-DMG (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2022)

Opinion

CV 21-4267-DMG (JCx)

12-27-2022

H.G. (a minor, by and through his parents, HEATHER GRAY AND ERYN GRAY), Plaintiff, v. ORCUTT UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM [138]

DOLLY M. GEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Having reviewed Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal of his Unruh Act Claim under Rule 41(a) [Doc. # 138] and Defendants' Response [Doc. # 139], the Court hereby DISMISSES Plaintiff's Unruh Act Claim without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2); see Hamilton v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., Inc., 679 F.2d 143, 145-46 (9th Cir. 1982) (Rule 41(a)(2) dismissals presumed to be without prejudice unless “plain legal prejudice” shown “beyond the prospect of a second lawsuit or when plaintiff merely gains some tactical advantage.”) (citation omitted).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

H.G. v. Orcutt Union Sch. Dist.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 27, 2022
CV 21-4267-DMG (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2022)
Case details for

H.G. v. Orcutt Union Sch. Dist.

Case Details

Full title:H.G. (a minor, by and through his parents, HEATHER GRAY AND ERYN GRAY)…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 27, 2022

Citations

CV 21-4267-DMG (JCx) (C.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2022)