From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heyward v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 15, 2021
21-CV-9376 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 15, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-9376 (LTS)

11-15-2021

MICHAEL HEYWARD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEES OR AMENDED IFP APPLICATION

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action pro se. To proceed with a civil action in this Court, a plaintiff must either pay $402.00 in fees - a $350.00 filing fee plus a $52.00 administrative fee - or, to request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

Plaintiff submitted an IFP application, but he does not fully answer the questions pertaining to his financial situation. Plaintiff states that he is not currently employed and that his last date of employment was “10/29/2021, ” but he does not provide his gross monthly wages at the time. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) Plaintiff further indicates that he has no other sources of income and that he has “$0” in a checking or savings account, but he does not answer the application's question asking how he pays the rent, transportation, and cable expenses, totaling over $2,000 per month, that he listed in response to question 6. (Id. at 2.)

Because of Plaintiff's failure to fully answer the questions about his financial status, the Court does not have sufficient information concerning Plaintiff's ability to pay the fees. Accordingly, within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $402.00 in fees or submit an amended IFP application. If Plaintiff submits the amended IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 21-CV-9376 (LTS), and address the deficiencies described above by providing facts to establish that he is unable to pay the filing fees. If the Court grants the amended IFP application, Plaintiff will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). If the Court finds that Plaintiff possesses the funds to pay the fees, he may be required to do so.

No summons shall issue at this time. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Heyward v. City of New York

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 15, 2021
21-CV-9376 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Heyward v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HEYWARD, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 15, 2021

Citations

21-CV-9376 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 15, 2021)