From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hey Inc. v. Twitter Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 10, 2023
22-mc-80034-DMR (N.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2023)

Opinion

22-mc-80034-DMR

07-10-2023

HEY, INC., Plaintiff, v. TWITTER, INC., Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Donna M. Ryu Chief Magistrate Judge

John Does 1 and 2 filed a motion to stay the court's June 6, 2023 Order pending their appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [Docket No. 25.] Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) and the court's June 26, 2023 Order (Docket No. 32), any brief in opposition to the motion to stay was due by June 29, 2023, but no such opposition has been received. Petitioner hey, Inc. is ordered to respond by July 14, 2023 and show cause for its failure to respond to the motion in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7-3(a) or alternatively to file a statement of nonopposition to the motion as required by Civil Local Rule 7-3(b). This order to show cause does not constitute permission to file a late opposition. If Petitioner does not respond by July 17, 2023, the motion to stay may be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hey Inc. v. Twitter Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 10, 2023
22-mc-80034-DMR (N.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2023)
Case details for

Hey Inc. v. Twitter Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HEY, INC., Plaintiff, v. TWITTER, INC., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 10, 2023

Citations

22-mc-80034-DMR (N.D. Cal. Jul. 10, 2023)