From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hewlett v. Kallis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mar 23, 2020
Case No. 19-cv-1123 (WMW/LIB) (D. Minn. Mar. 23, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 19-cv-1123 (WMW/LIB)

03-23-2020

Auzio Hewlett, Plaintiff, v. Warden Kallis, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the January 7, 2020 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois. (Dkt. 17.) No objections to the R&R have been filed. In the absence of timely objections, this Court reviews an R&R for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&R, the Court finds no clear error.

Based on the R&R and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Petitioner Auzio Hewlett's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, (Dkt. 1), is DENIED.

2. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: March 23, 2020

s/Wilhelmina M. Wright

Wilhelmina M. Wright

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hewlett v. Kallis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mar 23, 2020
Case No. 19-cv-1123 (WMW/LIB) (D. Minn. Mar. 23, 2020)
Case details for

Hewlett v. Kallis

Case Details

Full title:Auzio Hewlett, Plaintiff, v. Warden Kallis, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Mar 23, 2020

Citations

Case No. 19-cv-1123 (WMW/LIB) (D. Minn. Mar. 23, 2020)