From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heuvel v. Dorothy

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 30, 2023
2:21-cv-02176-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02176-TLN-CKD

01-30-2023

JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, Plaintiff, v. DOROTHY, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge

On December 13, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 13, 2022, are ADOPTED;

2. The action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Heuvel v. Dorothy

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jan 30, 2023
2:21-cv-02176-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2023)
Case details for

Heuvel v. Dorothy

Case Details

Full title:JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, Plaintiff, v. DOROTHY, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jan 30, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-02176-TLN-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2023)

Citing Cases

Heuvel v. McMillan

In Van Den Huevel v. Dorothy, plaintiff filed an action against three librarians alleging due process…