Summary
In Heuer we considered it to be irrelevant whether there was available public transportation or living accommodations at or near the place of business.
Summary of this case from Sanders v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueOpinion
No. 18233.
December 6, 1960.
Petition for Review of Decision of the Tax Court of the United States (District of Louisiana).
Louis Dutrey, Elwood H. Clay, New Orleans, La., Clay, Coleman, Dutrey Thomson, New Orleans, La., for petitioners.
C. Guy Tadlock, Robert N. Anderson, Lee A. Jackson, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Charles P. Dugan, Sp. Atty., I.R.S., Hart H. Spiegel, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Washington, D.C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before RIVES, Chief Judge, and CAMERON and JONES, Circuit Judges.
The facts from which this controversy arose and the reasons given by the Tax Court for its decisions sustaining the position of the Commissioner are set forth in the opinion of the Tax Court. Heuer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 32 T.C. 947. We are in agreement with the conclusions reached by the Tax Court and its decision is
Affirmed.