From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hetson v. Sommers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 9, 1945
269 App. Div. 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Summary

In Hetson v. Sommers (48 N.Y.S.2d 35), the Appellate Term in this department affirmed a denial of a motion to vacate a judgment entered upon substituted service although, as appears from the dissenting opinion, the defendant, domiciled in this State, was in Trinidad under a one-year contract in connection with the erection of the United States naval base.

Summary of this case from Alvord Alvord v. Patenotre

Opinion

February 9, 1945.

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.


Determination unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.


Summaries of

Hetson v. Sommers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 9, 1945
269 App. Div. 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

In Hetson v. Sommers (48 N.Y.S.2d 35), the Appellate Term in this department affirmed a denial of a motion to vacate a judgment entered upon substituted service although, as appears from the dissenting opinion, the defendant, domiciled in this State, was in Trinidad under a one-year contract in connection with the erection of the United States naval base.

Summary of this case from Alvord Alvord v. Patenotre
Case details for

Hetson v. Sommers

Case Details

Full title:ISIDOR HETSON, Respondent, v. IRVING SOMMERS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 9, 1945

Citations

269 App. Div. 655 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Citing Cases

Alvord Alvord v. Patenotre

In both these cited cases the order for substituted service was vacated only because there was neither…