From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hessmer v. Colson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE
Jun 28, 2012
No. 3:12-0252 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 28, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-0252

06-28-2012

JOHN HESSMER, Petitioner, v. WARDEN COLSON Respondent.


JUDGE HAYNES


ORDER

The Court ordered Plaintiff to cease filing pro se documents as he is represented by counsel. (Docket Entry Nos. 33 and 38). Petitioner is once more hereby DIRECTED to CEASE FILING pro se documents as long as he is represented by counsel, and "any further attempts to do so will be interpreted by the Court as deliberately acting in direct contravention of a court order." See United States v. Darwich, No. 09-CR-20280, 2010 WL 4822891, at *1 (E.D.Mich. Nov. 22, 2010). If Petitioner desires to proceed pro se, he may direct his attorney to file a motion to withdraw, sating the reasons therefor. The Clerk is DIRECTED to return to Plaintiff the documents mailed by Petitioner on June 26, 2012.

It is so ORDERED.

_______________

William J. Haynes, Jr.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hessmer v. Colson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE
Jun 28, 2012
No. 3:12-0252 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Hessmer v. Colson

Case Details

Full title:JOHN HESSMER, Petitioner, v. WARDEN COLSON Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

Date published: Jun 28, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-0252 (M.D. Tenn. Jun. 28, 2012)