Hesla v. Cedars 94/the Goodman Grp.

Full title: PAUL HESLA, Plaintiff, v. CEDARS 94/THE GOODMAN GROUP, THE PRE-PETITION…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Civil No. 13-285 (RHK/JJG) (D. Minn. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Civil No. 13-285 (RHK/JJG)

02-25-2013

PAUL HESLA, Plaintiff, v. CEDARS 94/THE GOODMAN GROUP, THE PRE-PETITION SCREENING PROGRAM, and ROSEMARY A. MUNNS, Defendants.

RICHARD H. KYLE

ORDER ON REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the undersigned's de novo review of the Objections, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Objections (Doc. No. 7) are OVERRULED;
2. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED;
3. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED; and
4. This action is summarily DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

____________________

RICHARD H. KYLE

United States District Judge