From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heser v. Heser

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Apr 27, 1989
438 N.W.2d 795 (Neb. 1989)

Opinion

No. 87-156.

Filed April 27, 1989.

Appeal from the District Court for Seward County: BRYCE BARTU, Judge. Affirmed.

Hal W. Anderson, of Berry, Anderson, Creager Wittstruck, for appellant.

Larry L. Brauer, of Allan, Brauer Mullally, for appellee.

HASTINGS, C.J., WHITE, CAPORALE, and FAHRNBRUCH, JJ., and COADY, D.J.


The respondent-appellee, Michael Paul Heser, cross-appeals the division of property. The petitioner-appellant, Patricia Ann Heser, has dismissed her appeal.

As required in cases of this nature, we have reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion in dividing the property of the parties. See, Fox v. Fox, 230 Neb. 218, 430 N.W.2d 542 (1988); Griffith v. Griffith, 230 Neb. 314, 431 N.W.2d 609 (1988).

Upon a de novo review of this case, we find no patent unfairness in the distribution of property and debts of the parties. See, Rezac v. Rezac, 221 Neb. 516, 378 N.W.2d 196 (1985); Black v. Black, 221 Neb. 533, 378 N.W.2d 849 (1985). Therefore, there was no abuse of discretion by the trial court, and its decree should be affirmed.

Each party shall pay his or her own costs and attorney fees in this court.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Heser v. Heser

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Apr 27, 1989
438 N.W.2d 795 (Neb. 1989)
Case details for

Heser v. Heser

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA ANN HESER, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. MICHAEL PAUL HESER…

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Apr 27, 1989

Citations

438 N.W.2d 795 (Neb. 1989)
438 N.W.2d 795

Citing Cases

Marshall v. Marshall

See Thiltges v. Thiltges, 247 Neb. 371, 527 N.W.2d 853 (1995). See Heser v. Heser, 231 Neb. 928, 438 N.W.2d…

Gibson-Voss v. Voss

Thiltges, supra. A division of property will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is patently unfair. Heser…