From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herring v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 16, 2017
No. 3:15-CV-1921-K (N.D. Tex. May. 16, 2017)

Opinion

No. 3:15-CV-1921-K

05-16-2017

MICHALE HERRING, ID # 1884959, Petitioner, v. LORIE DAVIS, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated in the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the petition for habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DENIED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Signed May 16th, 2017.

/s/_________

ED KINKEADE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Herring v. Davis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
May 16, 2017
No. 3:15-CV-1921-K (N.D. Tex. May. 16, 2017)
Case details for

Herring v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:MICHALE HERRING, ID # 1884959, Petitioner, v. LORIE DAVIS, Director, Texas…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: May 16, 2017

Citations

No. 3:15-CV-1921-K (N.D. Tex. May. 16, 2017)