From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrera-Welker v. Oregon

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Feb 28, 2024
1:22-cv-00401-CL (D. Or. Feb. 28, 2024)

Opinion

1:22-cv-00401-CL

02-28-2024

RAFAEL HERRERA-WELKER, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON; OREGON DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; K. WHITE; CYNTHIA DIETER; GARTH GULICK; PATRICK MANEY; L. GRUENWALD; DAVID GORDANIER; C. CAMPOS; HAILEY COLEMAN; JAMES KEMPAS; TINA HAZEN; ROBERT HOLDEN; ANTONIO FERNANDEZ; CANDA ZIMMERLY; WARREN ROBERTS and JOHN AND JANE DOES, Defendant.


ORDER

Michael McShane United States District Judge

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 25), and the matter is now before this Court.s See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). I review de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct.

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 24) is adopted in full. The Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is granted. Plaintiff's first, second, and third claims for relief are dismissed. Plaintiff's claims against the State of Oregon, ODOC, and all individual Defendants in their official capacity are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Campos-Hernandez, Coleman, and Gordanier are dismissed with prejudice. Claims against Defendant Gulick in his individual capacity are dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Herrera-Welker v. Oregon

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Feb 28, 2024
1:22-cv-00401-CL (D. Or. Feb. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Herrera-Welker v. Oregon

Case Details

Full title:RAFAEL HERRERA-WELKER, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON; OREGON DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Feb 28, 2024

Citations

1:22-cv-00401-CL (D. Or. Feb. 28, 2024)