Herrera v. Wheeler

Full title: ROBERTO HERRERA, Plaintiff, v. B. WHEELER, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 11, 2013

2:10-cv-1280 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 11, 2013)

Opinion

ROBERTO HERRERA, Plaintiff, v. B. WHEELER, et al., Defendants. No. 2:10-cv-1280 GEB DAD P United States District Court, E.D. California. January 11, 2013

          ORDER

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 26, 2012, plaintiff filed a second motion for temporary injunctive relief. Plaintiff's first motion was denied by order filed September 14, 2012 (Doc. No. 35). Plaintiff's present motion suffers from the same defects identified in the court's September 14, 2012 order denying his first motion for temporary injunctive. For that reason, good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's November 26, 2012 motion for emergency injunction (Doc. No. 46) is denied without prejudice.