From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrera v. Statti

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 14, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-01154 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:10-cv-01154 MCE DAD P

01-14-2013

ROBERTO HERRERA, Plaintiff, v. P. STATTI, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has filed requests for appointment of counsel on December 10, 2012 and January 7, 2013. Plaintiff has filed at least six prior requests seeking the appointment of counsel on his behalf. All of those requests have been denied based upon the court's original finding that exceptional circumstances did not exist so as to justify the appointment of counsel in this federal habeas action. (See Doc. No. 11.) In light of the court's prior orders and for the same reasons stated in those orders, plaintiff's pending requests for the appointment of counsel will again be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's December 10, 2012 and January 7, 2013 motions for appointment of counsel (Docs. No. 49 & 61) are denied.

______________________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Herrera v. Statti

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 14, 2013
No. 2:10-cv-01154 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2013)
Case details for

Herrera v. Statti

Case Details

Full title:ROBERTO HERRERA, Plaintiff, v. P. STATTI, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 14, 2013

Citations

No. 2:10-cv-01154 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 14, 2013)