Opinion
No. 05-03-01698-CR
Opinion Filed February 14, 2005. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the County Criminal Court Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. MA03-58013-A. Affirmed.
Before Justices WHITTINGTON, FITZGERALD, and RICHTER.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The trial court convicted Jorge Alejandro Herrera of burglary of a vehicle. Punishment was assessed at 365 days confinement in county jail. Appellant appeals his conviction. We affirm. Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant he has a right to file a pro se response. Appellant, however, did not file a pro se response. We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirm the trial court's judgment.