From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrera v. Idemudia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-2293 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:16-cv-2293 JAM CKD P

12-06-2016

ARMANDO HERRERA, Plaintiff, v. M. IDEMUDIA, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances at this time. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied without prejudice to renewal at a later stage of the litigation.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment (ECF No. 24) of counsel is denied without prejudice to renewal at a later stage of the litigation. Dated: December 6, 2016

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2/kly
herr2293.31


Summaries of

Herrera v. Idemudia

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dec 6, 2016
No. 2:16-cv-2293 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2016)
Case details for

Herrera v. Idemudia

Case Details

Full title:ARMANDO HERRERA, Plaintiff, v. M. IDEMUDIA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Dec 6, 2016

Citations

No. 2:16-cv-2293 JAM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2016)