From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herrera v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 17, 2004
8 A.D.3d 139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

3941.

Decided June 17, 2004.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered December 18, 2002, upon a jury verdict, in favor of defendants-respondents, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

David Samel, New York, for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for municipal respondent.

Gallagher, Walker, Bianco Plastaras, Esqs., Mineola (Dominic P. Bianco of counsel), for Anthony D'Amico Son, Inc., respondent.

Before: Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Friedman, Marlow, JJ.


Plaintiff commenced this action to recover for injuries sustained when she fell, allegedly by reason of a defect in a City-owned sidewalk that had been the site of recent repair work by defendant contractor Anthony D'Amico Son. Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the trial court properly declined to charge New York City Administrative Code § 19-152(a) to the jury. Section 19-152(a) imposes no affirmative sidewalk maintenance duty on either defendant City or defendant contractor and, accordingly, proof of its violation would not have been probative of plaintiff's claim of negligence against those defendants ( see Gonzalez v. Iocovello, 93 N.Y.2d 539, 552; St. Jacques v. City of New York, 88 N.Y.2d 920).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Herrera v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 17, 2004
8 A.D.3d 139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

Herrera v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MARIA HERRERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 17, 2004

Citations

8 A.D.3d 139 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
779 N.Y.S.2d 27