Opinion
3:22-cv-00165-SLG
11-16-2023
HEATHER HERNDON, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN, et al., Defendants.
ORDER RE EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SHARON L. GLEASON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Before the Court at Docket 86 is Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Herndon did not file a response to the motion and Experian filed an additional brief in support of the motion at Docket 90.
On the current record, no evidence exists to demonstrate a genuine issue for trial on any claim that Plaintiff's claim could be construed to assert against Experian. Further, Experian has demonstrated that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, Experian is entitled to summary judgment in its favor and its motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a); Celotex Corp. v. Catreet, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986).
Plaintiff did file a Petition for Name Change at Docket 89, seeking to have her name not appear in all capitals in the case caption. The request is DENIED because it is inconsistent with the Local Civil Rules for the District of Alaska. See Local Civil Rule 7.5 Exemplar.
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter a final judgment accordingly.