From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Herndon v. Dep't of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2016
No. 2:15-cv-2255 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2016)

Opinion

No. 2:15-cv-2255 JAM KJN P

01-27-2016

GERROD LONZELL HERNDON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondents.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed December 9, 2015, petitioner's habeas application was dismissed and thirty days' leave to file an amended application was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the ///// ///// specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: January 27, 2016

/s/_________

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Hern2255.fta


Summaries of

Herndon v. Dep't of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 27, 2016
No. 2:15-cv-2255 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2016)
Case details for

Herndon v. Dep't of Justice

Case Details

Full title:GERROD LONZELL HERNDON, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 27, 2016

Citations

No. 2:15-cv-2255 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2016)