Opinion
No. 2:16-cv-1410 CKD P
08-12-2016
GERROD L. HERNDON, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA STATE PAROLE OFFICE, et al., Defendants.
ORDER and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on June 22, 2016, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) As the application was incomplete, on June 30, 2016, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to file a completed affidavit in support of his request and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff was advised that failure to comply with this order would result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. (Id.) The thirty-day period has passed, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a district judge to this action.
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). ////
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: August 12, 2016
/s/_________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 / hern1410.fifp