From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Birkholtz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Oct 8, 2018
Civil No. 18-cv-0742 (MJD/HB) (D. Minn. Oct. 8, 2018)

Opinion

Civil No. 18-cv-0742 (MJD/HB)

10-08-2018

ELIO HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. WARDEN BIRKHOLTZ and FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER ROCHESTER, Respondents.


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.

Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;

2. Petitioner's application for habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. No. 1] is DENIED; and

3. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: October 8, 2018

s/ Michael J. Davis

MICHAEL J. DAVIS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Birkholtz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Oct 8, 2018
Civil No. 18-cv-0742 (MJD/HB) (D. Minn. Oct. 8, 2018)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Birkholtz

Case Details

Full title:ELIO HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. WARDEN BIRKHOLTZ and FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Oct 8, 2018

Citations

Civil No. 18-cv-0742 (MJD/HB) (D. Minn. Oct. 8, 2018)