From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. Trate

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 5, 2023
1:22-cv-01115-DJ-SAB-HC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2023)

Opinion

1:22-cv-01115-DJ-SAB-HC

12-05-2023

JAIRO JOAQUIN HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. B.M. TRATE, Respondent.


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 22)

Petitioner is proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

On October 30, 2023, the Court issued findings and recommendation recommending dismissal of the Second Amended Petition. (ECF No. 20.) On December 1, 2023, the Court received the instant motion for extension of time. (ECF No. 22.) It appears that Petitioner has not received the findings and recommendation in the mail, but rather was informed of the matter by a third party who “explained to [Petitioner] what was placed online through a phone call.” (ECF No. 22 at 2.)

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner is granted SIXTY (60) days from the date of service of this order to file objections to the findings and recommendation; and
2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mail a copy of the findings and recommendation (ECF No. 20) to Petitioner.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. Trate

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 5, 2023
1:22-cv-01115-DJ-SAB-HC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Hernandez v. Trate

Case Details

Full title:JAIRO JOAQUIN HERNANDEZ, Petitioner, v. B.M. TRATE, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 5, 2023

Citations

1:22-cv-01115-DJ-SAB-HC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2023)