From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 28, 2002
824 So. 2d 997 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 3D01-1844.

August 28, 2002.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Thomas C. Mielke, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and SORONDO, JJ.


ON MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL


As the trial court has certified after unsuccessful efforts to re-establish the record under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), and as the state agrees, material omissions in the transcript of testimony make meaningful appellate review of the trial below impossible. Accordingly, the defendant's motion for new trial is granted. See Delap v. State, 350 So.2d 462 (Fla. 1977); Murphy v. State, 789 So.2d 1235, 1236 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), and cases cited. The conviction and sentence below are reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

Motion granted.


Summaries of

Hernandez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 28, 2002
824 So. 2d 997 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Hernandez v. State

Case Details

Full title:Armando HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 28, 2002

Citations

824 So. 2d 997 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)